School Paper

University of Asia and the Pacific os drive, Ortigas split up Bill An argu custodytative powership Submitted as partial fulfillment For the sort requirements in English 102 Submitted to Ms. Judy Tanael 10/8/2012 Is Divorce in truth necessary? gibe to the Compendium of the Catholic Church, the Sacrament of wedding party means that couples would establish a matrimonial and exclusive coalition amongst them (Ratzinger, 2005). This bond earth-closet never be mazed un little the espousals is null or declargond by an ecclesiastical authority that they be separated (Ratzinger, 2005).Coming from Gods Law, a unification must non be destroyed beca wont of the bond that is eternally naturalized (Ratzinger, 2005). The Philippines, on the different hand, known for its be a apparitional country, generally, believes in God. T presentfore, it would be bizarre for Catholics to hope the promulgation this institutionalize. Despite the religious notion, disassociate has several effect on pincerren, family and the edict itself. no provided does part cause dispute in the family, it is possible that it be inclined to iniquitys that would be discussed further.The purpose of this penning is for the reader to determine whether or not this bill must be utilise or not. This paper in guides to defend the authors stand by providing credible arguments for the counter arguments. T here be umpteen reasons why the Philippines should not cede a disarticulate law. Although it would be impossible to defer them all, this paper in disposes to discuss the major bingles. harmonise to the H. B. 1799, this bill proposes the harborion and fundamental comparison of men and women (Ilagan & De Jesus, 2010).Proponents of the bill propose is a means to deal with domestic problems such as married abuse, power, and possibly mental incapacities (Ilagan & De Jesus, 2010). Does it satisfyingly nurture and safeguard par for men and women in any way of life? This p aper call downs that this bill does little to protect the future frugal well-being of reliant mates, which tend to be female. Divorce allow not protect men, women or nonetheless the children for that matter. Is it really a solution for married meshs?It is true that disassociate move be a medicine for these reasons however hold of it as a medicine that is not recommended. Why? If a couple fall back to disassociate because maybe of an abusive mate, do you think that the abusive spouse wouldnt repeat what he did with his former spouse? And when he does, what do you nominate would hand? I think a split remedy could come in handy. What I am trying to say here is that, marriages and marital conflicts could be fixed. Abuse, violence and mental incapacities be problems that throw out easily be cured.How? By reverenceing God and teaching morality. If we fear God and know what morality really means, then none of these would have exited in the first place. As what God sa id, Wives, turn to your husbands. Husbands, remotegon your wife as you love yourselves (Ephesians 522-33). This is where you gain happiness and largeness of marital life and your family. Divorce leads to long negative personal effects on the family. It affects e genuinely(prenominal) member of the family nucleus, and when at that place ar children affect they ar the most affected of all.Children from part families atomic number 18 more probable to ingest from mental difficulties than those of whole families (Portnoy, 2008). These problems accommodate but are not limited to mis exact, ugly academic performance, and earlier than usual intimate exercise (Portnoy, 2008). In addition, disjoin leads to long-term negative effects on the family. It dismiss lead to several problems that could affect not but the spouses but in addition, most especially, their children.Studies suggest that there are long-term effects on the childrens psychological leeway that coul d affect their future births, symptoms such as anxiety, depression, conduct problems, academic performance, relationships, distress and subjective well-being can develop end-to-end time for children that are involved in fall apart families (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006). Studies show that children of disunite are inclined to experience psychological difficulties than children from intact or complete families, and those effects are credibly to stay put into bigheartedhood (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, axerophthol Tambs, 2006). Conduct problems are likely to make out place in this situation. Among the numerous reactions and effects of children in disassociate families, conduct disorders, unsociable bearings, and difficulty with authorities produce the largest disreputable outcomes. According to a national, they are twain or three times more likely to engage in teen delinquency than their friends from intact families, it was said that there is a higher inciden ce of conduct problems in boys than in girls (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006).Adolescent children from a separate family are also more likely to drink alcohol frequently and use prohibited drugs than children from a complete family (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006). In conclusion, divorce of ones parents greatly impacts and disrupts the lives of these children. The psychological, emotional, and behavioral reactions results to years of distress or disorder which is likely to extend into heavy(p)hood, impact however their romantic relationships.Although the majority of children of divorce recover comfortingly by and by whatever years, that recovery does not vanish those years of significant adjustment difficulty, nor is it complete sufficient to leave these people unharmed (Stroksen, Roysamb, Holmen, & Tambs, 2006). On the other hand, offspring, especially adults, of divorced families tend to comprehend a less unequi birdsong reaction toward marriage and associate marital conflict with current relationship with a negative betoken of view (Portnoy, 2008).A study conducted by the Florida State University (2010), using a sample of two hundred and lxxx five adolescents, structural equation stamp resisted the hypothesis that parental divorce and marital conflict were in helplessly associated with younker adult childrens romantic relationships by means of different mechanisms Parental divorce was associated with new(a) adults low level of relationship calibre through a negative positioning toward marriage (positive attitude toward divorce) and lose of lading to their own current relationships.However, marital conflict was associated with young adults low level of relationship quality through their conflict behavior with their partner (Cui & Fincham, 2010, p. 331). These effects can be long lasting, leading to other symptoms such as anxiety and depression. Divorce would un needs subject children to this type of emotional distres s. Furthermore, as children develop into adolescents and in conclusion adults, they tend to adopt well-disposed behaviors that they see in their parents.Hence, they are inclined to develop their attitude towards romantic relationships and marriage from their observations of that of their parents (Cui & Fincham, 2010). Cui and Fincham (2010) stated that there is an opposite correlation between parental divorce and attitude towards marriage, as well as tearment to relationships. This suggests the possibility that divorce can breed more divorce. Furthermore, there are certain(prenominal) effects of divorce on Womens Health that could affect their psychological adjustment as well.Studies show that women develop psychological distress after experiencing divorce. In addition, women tend to experience high level of depressive symptoms which can lead to physical and mental wellness problems (Lorenz, Wickrama, Conger, Jr. , 2006). sparingally speaking, divorce has a detrimental effect on the spouse that was not gainfully employed and because was financially dependent during the marriage (Ananat Michaels, 2007). In part, this is due to what is called economies of scale. Married couples share economic and cordial resources during their marriage (Waite, 1995).Since many of the cost incurred in maintaining a family household are fixed, the unite economic well-being of a married will be necessarily be better when compared to that of divorced individuals. This has far greater consequences for women than men given that women are more likely dependent on their husbands income during marriage. Research estimates that after divorce women experience a stemma in income of between 23% and 73% (Beller Graham, 1985). The bill does provide some post-divorce support for the dependent spouse.This support is only essential until the dependent spouse finds adequate engagement, but it is not to exceed one year in duration (Ilagan De Jesus, 2010). However, the equivocalness i n the language of the bill when it refers to the employment requirement to be adequate, conjugated with the time limitation on the marriage support makes this provision inadequate, as it fails to protect the post-divorce economic well-being of the dependent spouse. Divorce is a major societal concern, and bon ton does not escape the devastating effects.The complaisant effects of divorce are very well documented. Research suggests that there is a positive correlation between divorce and crime (Wong, 2011). Wong (2011) argues that children from single-parent and divorced families have a higher predisposition towards criminal activity than those from intact families. Other studies suggest that adult males are less likely to commit crimes when they are married (Scafidi, 2008). There are several reasons that could be discussed on how family din, because of divorce, can be positively correlated to crime.Due to minimum supervision of parent/s and lack of parental guidance, their chil d could possibly be processd or inclined to crime. Research suggests there is a positive correlation between divorce and crime. According to a British Crime observe in 1982, it was measured that family disruption as a combined index of marital separation, divorce, and single-parenthood, and they found that family disruption amplified the rates of robbery, stranger violence, burglary, auto-theft, and theft/vandalism (Wong, 2011).Aside from the stated reasons, there are also certain effects on social disorganization because of family disruption. According to Wongs (2011) social disorganization theory, the theoretical model here claims that pauperism, mobility, and heterogeneity extend the prospect of divorce, single-parenthood, and crime (Wong, 2011). Focusing on low income and dismissed males may reduce the number of marriageable males and escalate the likelihood of family disruption (Wong, 2011).Concerning the influence of poverty on crime, poverty depletes the communitys res ources, reduces its subject matter to meet its members basic needs, and reduces its ability to monitor and control criminal activities, therefore eventually causing crime and delinquency to increase (Wong, 2011). Aside from the already mentioned social be, divorce imposes an economic burden on familiarity as well. The direct be to the establishment include all divorce court related expenditures.This includes not only the cost of the judge, but also that of his rung and other employees, utilities cost, records be, along with other expenditures (Schramm, 2006). When designing these be we must not only take into consideration the costs of the divorce proceeding itself, but also other related proceeding, such as those for alimony, child support, and child custody (Schramm, 2006). The higher crime rates associated with family fragmentation increase the costs of the criminal justice system (Scafidi, 2008). This includes the costs to law enforcement, prosecution, the judiciary, a nd corrections.Scafidi (2008) found that approximately 24% of is caused by family fragmentation. The cost of investigating and prosecuting these crimes amounts to roughly ? 800 billion (Scafidi, 2008). Other costs include those associated with loss of productivity, foregone tax revenues, assistance to fragmented family who fall under the poverty line, and increased health expenditures to deal with psychological effects, just to name a a few(prenominal) (Scafidi, 2008). In countries like the United States, to enumerate costs associated with divorce and fragmented families exceeds $ c billion every year (Scafidi, 2008).There is probably no completely accurate or even scientific approach for find the economic impact to couples, comminutes, and even society as a whole. From what we can calculate, the a posteriori data suggest that the costs are substantial (Scafidi, 2008). These costs are real and someone must pay the price. Schramm (2006) suggests that these costs are absorbed by individuals, as well as communities, and governments. The Philippines is a for the most part Christian nation with a substantial Catholic community.As the religion of the majority of Filipinos, the point of view of the Church should not be overlooked. From the Catholic Bishop Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) to Pope benedict XVI himself, the Church has been very vocal and adamantly opposed to this bill. In a letter from His Holiness addressing the CBCP, the Pope instructed the bishops to continue their pursuit in defense of the sacredness of marriage and of the family (Aquino, 2011). Jo Imbong, legal counsel for the CBCP, even explicit the Churchs position claiming the polity is unconstitutional (Alvarez, 2011).Article XV of the 1987 Constitution describes marriage as an inviolable social inception (Constitutional Commission, 1986). Those who oppose their position say that divorce is not only constitutional, but it promotes state-supported policy as well (Gloria, 2007). G loria (2007) suggest that the bill embodies the spirit of the constitution by promoting the sanctity of the family, dignity of human life, the trade protection of the youth, and equality among men and women. On the other hand, divorce gives a wider path for delinquency and infidelity. In my opinion, morality in the contemporaneous is fleeing.It is neither commonly discussed nor practiced anymore in this country except for religious sectors. I could cite several incidents regarding the unfairness of Filipinos but it would be off topic. Nevertheless, The Philippines have a low moral debasement and this is the reason why these proponents with regard to divorce advocate unreasonable solution for certain problems. Didnt we learn from the United States? Did the statistics of violence against women drop when the divorce law was utilize? According to the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS) nigh 1. million women are physically abused and/or raped by their husband yearly (MI NCAVA, 2010). On the worsened part, in 2000, 1,247 women were killed by their husbands, while 440 men were killed by their wives (MINCAVA, 2010). More or less these domesticated incidents are inevitable, they are ought to happen because let us face it the absence seizure of goodness keeps taking place. What I am coming to is that, physical abuse, rape and even murder happen annually unheeding of the divorce law. Divorce is just another(prenominal) way for couples to resort because thats what the government wants they want us to depend on them.We are often too dependent that we for jump about problem result and thinking critically. We talk much about the positive effects that we can get from the divorce law, whereas obviously the negative effects far outweigh the positive. References Alvarez, K. (2011, June 2). Divorce bill unconstitutional. Retrieved September 19, 2012, from Sun Star manilla http//www. sunstar. com. ph/manila/local-news/2011/06/02/divorce-bill-unconstitutional-158 847 Ananat, E. O. , & Michaels, G. (2007, April). The Effect of marital Breakup on the Income Distribution.CEP Discussion piece of music No 787. London Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics. Aquino, L. G. (2011, July 9). Pope No to RH, divorce. Retrieved September 19, 2012, from The Manila Bulletin http//www. mb. com. ph/node/326152/pope-no-rh-divorce Beller, A. H. , & Graham, J. W. (1985). Variations in the Economic eudaemonia of Divorced Women and Their Children The Role of Child choke Income. In M. David, & T. Smeeding, Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty, and Economic public assistance (pp. 471-510). Chicago University of Chicago Press.Constitutional Commission. (1986, October 15). The 1987 Constitution of the nation of the Philippines. Quezon City Constitutional Commission of 1986. Cui, M. , & Fincham, F. D. (2010). The derivative effects of parental divorce and marital conflict on young adult romantic relationships. Journal of the International tie-up fo r Relationship Research(17), 331-343. Gloria, C. K. (2007). Who Needs Divorce in the Philippines? Mindanao Law Journal, 18-28. Ilagan, L. C. , & De Jesus, E. A. (2010, July 27). House Bill No. 1799. An Act Introducing Divorce In The