Chaotic Nature Essay Example for Free

Chaotic Nature EssayThe chaotic nature of the national socialist politics structure explains the failures in German struggle production during the Second World War. Discuss. There is broad evidence that Germanys war production levels increased during the Second World War in 1942, when ammunition, tanks and number arms increased by significant percentages due to Albert Speer relaxing constraints on businesses, and increasing the number of exiters. However, unrivalled can non non deny that the chaotic nature of the Nazi Government structure undermined war production excessively, due to the fact the German economy was not fully mobilised for war. It is also evident that the shortage of raw materials and drive affected the economy surgeively, further much with the SS remaining firm to themselves murdering six million Jews instead of seeking labour. The rouge ingredient of the failures in German war production is that the Nazi state was too chaotic and remained loyal to their ideology rather than to the war effort, with too many agencies competing for any consistent policy to be hypothecate hence slackening war production.Certainly, the chaotic nature of the Nazi Government is the most significant factor of Germanys failed war production. Hitler planned to start the war in 1942, 3 years later than when it officially started, additionally he didnt plan when and how he was going to attack the USSR. The actual mobilisation of the German economy was marred by inefficiency and poor co-ordination. Additionally, Nazi moderateership was shocking, as the pressures resulting from the premature outbreak of war created problems, due to many agencies projects encouraged being ready for 1943.As a result, all the agencies continued to go away in their own way, and not together which created conflict. Thus, the Nazi economy was characterised by shortages, duplicates and waste with Britain spending fractional as much and producing 50% more. Therefore, with a ll the Nazi agencies working on their own to impress Hitler, and not together, there was no clear plan in how to increase war production, just ways in which to electrify the Fuhrer and not total war.Additionally, Gauleiter also had different aims than the state, and aimed to Germanise and not develop the war economy, which also lead to mass shortages in labour and raw materials. Indeed, the SS played a huge role in check Germanys war production. The SS were in charge of all the diligent concentration camps, and towards the end of the war they were in charge of 150 firms exploiting slave labour to extract raw materials and manufacture textiles, armaments, and household goods. Additionally, the SS never used occupied countries economy, thence did not use their industries successfully.Heinrich Himmler, the leader of the SS clashed with Speer due to the fact concentration camp factories were inefficient, as Speer preferred using paid labour in occupied countries. In conjunction with this point, labour in the concentration camps contained horrific conditions, gum olibanum workers could not work efficiently in the camps to produce the amounts anticipated. Therefore, if the SS exploited occupied countries economies, then they would have been able to use paid labour, resulting in the workers working harder to the war effort thus producing more raw materials vital to the war effort.In addition, the SS were in the mould of exterminating 6 million Jews, use ammunition, raw materials, and supplies on them keeping them in concentration camps. One cannot contradict on the fact that Nazi ideology limited Germanys war production. The Nazis viewed the war as a radical war, in which the superior Aryans would triumph over the Slavs and inferior groups and they aimed to make the whole of Europe become Jew Free. The Nazis had utilised the Great Depression to gain support, promising bread and work.As a result, Hitler always believed that he take to give the people bread and butter at the same time as backup a war economy thus Hitler wanted to keep up with the production of consumer goods. By doing this concentrating on consumer goods as opposed to total war production vastly slowed down the production of armaments, ammunition, and many more materials essential to the war effort. These nationalistic beliefs also undermined labour, as conscription of women was ideologically based, with the Nazi view of women revolving just about Kinder, Kuche, and Kirche (children, kitchen, church).Consequently, due to such nationalist views and remaining loyal to Nazi ideology, war production could not increase due to a huge shortage in labour, with women persisting to be viewed as the stereotypical housewife, thus if women were conscripted to the labour force, war production would have been of vast improvements. Additionally, the Jewish race could have been used as a labour force to the war effort, instead of being held captive at concentration camps delay to be mu rdered.However, putting a side Nazi ideology, it is said that Albert Speer nearly worked a miracle, by employing women and qualification concentration camps as labour camps so there was whatsoever success in the war economy. Finally, because of the ruinous nature of the Nazi Government, labour and raw materials were extremely short, thus resorted to total war as an plan of attack to quickly increase war production. Natural resources such as iron, coal, oil and many more needed to be produced at tolerable standards that were needed for a sustained war effort.In order to mesh a major war, Germany needed the annex of other nations resources, which initially failed due to the failure of military Blitzkreig in 1942. Additionally, these shortages of raw materials were due to the lack of labour in Germany, as womens labour declined from 14. 6 million, to 14. 1 million. However, womens labour peaked to 14. 9 million in 1944, due to the actions of Speer, who employed more women in arms factories which did however increase Germanys war production. Speers actions were effective during total war, in the process of rationalisation when he made huge improvements in the economy.So yes, during total war and rationalisation, Germanys war production was looking positive, but due to the small production of raw materials and a shortage of workers, Germany could not produce enough to make a real significance in the war effort. Undeniably, Germany did see some success in war production due to the actions of Albert Speer, having such a good relationship with Hitler he was able to relax constraints on businesses that were made to fit the Nazis wishes. Thus, this encouraged his programme of industrial self-responsibility to provide mass production in Germany which inevitably succeeded.Nevertheless, there is no denying the reality that it was primarily the chaotic nature of the governing that caused failure within Germanys war production. Due to Nazi ideology, there was no intens e fealty to the war effort shown by any agencies, as they all acted to impress Hitler, thus did not work together stalling war production massively. In conjunction with this, the chaotic nature of the Nazi politics deeply effected labour, with a shortage of female workers. Finally, as a result, raw materials were significantly behind, thus there was no proper sustained war effort.