To Discuss Whether the Classless Society Is Attainable and Sustainable in This Century

The aim of this denomination is to discuss whether the disciplineless inn is come-at-able and sustainable in this century. To get off the definition of concepts ar given, then the origin of the disunitees. It then looks at how the capitalisticic society micklenot evolve to the disseverless society in this century. harmonize to Ernesto (200717), Classes be a large group of mass who differ in their congress to the way of life of their role in the friendly stinting and political giving medication. Their anatomy stratus is intendd by their ready to the means of return. agree to Ernesto (200717), the possible action of Karl Marx depicts four stages that have societies evolved in the last centauries and from the last stage, the disunite struggles can hence bring the classless society. According to Friedrich (194425), one of his greatest debates was the write regarding the immunity of mankind. The main determining fixings for Karl Marx for a classless society and fre edom is class conflict. He besides asserts that Karl Marx traced the history of mankind by the looks in which the economy operated and the role of classes within the economy.Because of this, the greatest factor in the classes was determining who causes this freedom. With this in mind, Karl Marx gives us a solution to twain the issues of freedom and class conflict in his critique of capitalist economy and guess of communism, which is the conceptionl society for Marx. His surmise of communism is based on the eventual(prenominal) end of human history because thither will be freedom for all humankind. Ernesto (200718) asserts that the conflict theory looks at how certain social interactions move on through conflict. People engage in conflict every daylight to form more tycoon than others in society.Karl Marx is known for studying the conflicts that occur among different classes. Karl Marx has introduced some radical ideas and theories to society through his writings. As t he industrial revolution moved forward in society, so did the widening transgress between class structures. Karl Marx studied the differences arising between the bourgeoisie and the labour people. According to Bellamy (200349), the bourgeoisies be interested mainly in developing a capitalist society, using advanced methods of production. The bourgeoisies atomic number 18 the capitalist who own the factories the products made in the factories, and control lead all the trade.The Proletariats or work class people have gained zipper in society solely the thrill of their own motor. The Proletariats feel that they are treated poorly by the middle class society. They receive that enough in life to survive and have no prognosis of achieving a higher, class status. According to Harding (1984), the bourgeoisie or middle class people in society were exploiting and degrading the Proletariat people. The Proletariats helped to improve production in society, which developed capitalism and helped it to grow faster.The Proletariats were not getting the salary they deserved for the drudge that was accomplished. Capital gain was being made for the labor the on the job(p) class provided, but there was s gutter no way of improving status in society. The middle class was taking everywhere and the rich were staying rich and the poor continued to be poor. Marx wanted the working class to stand up to the bourgeoisie and cause a class conflict. The idea was that if the working class revolted against the capitalist, it would bring ab surface the revolution that would establish the capitalist society into a classless society.According to Holmes (2009), Karl Marx saw communism as the ideal society which was also the classless society because it is the factual dissolver of the conflict between man and man the true resolution of the strife between existence and essence, between freedom and necessity that capitalism fosters. Holmes (2009) also alludes to how Karl Marx was also committed to the notion that theory and action go hand in hand. He dismissed earlier philosophers or thinkers because they solely interpreted the humanity in various ways His main idea however is to change the world.He also stated Ideas cannot carry out anything at all. In order to carry out ideas men are needed who can exert practical force. From Dirlik (198928) view of this theory, there are various reasons why the classless society cannot be attainable in this day and age. Firstly Attaining the classless society using Karl Marxs theory of communism is not possible because it failed to offer principles or guidelines of even the most(prenominal) general kind for how the system of communism was to be fully established. He is simply shows the stages and the classless paradise which could be attained by conflict.No procedures of conflict are also depicted for the working class to be able to come into harmony with the capitalists. It is this lack of practical guidelines that shows t he theory would be doomed to fail if used in practice. Another contradiction of its failure to be attained and sustained is the fact that Karl Marxs theory stems from the social conditions live during his lifetime. According to Theodore (200466), this was when the industrial revolution was hitting its stride therefore led him to making this theory. Great technological advances were being made to the modes of production.According to Theodore (200467), Mobility of people from class to class is hindered by who owns the means of production. Moving from a spotless worker to a manufacturing business can be so pricy on individuals and sometimes impossible in other instances. The people having the power increase in power while only serving their own interest. For example, if a person was working as a worker in a mine, it can sometimes be impossible even if the social conflict exists. The worker will not move from the side of the proletariat to the bourgeoisies but will simply move to a h igher class within the working class.The worker is only likely to be promoted till he can even have the power to lead the organization but not own the means of production. Because of the nature of their training and the labor they offer according to their skill, they are trapped on the working class side of the capitalist society. Dirlik (1989120) Mobility form one class to the other is also sometimes impossible because the capitalist will only have economic deals with other capitalists. One producer will interact with another producer making it impossible for the working class to even know the world of the producer.It would even be foregn to him as long as he works. If mobility was flourishing from the working class side to the capitalist class, then we would one day have what is called an equilibrium where everyone can freely determine their own beam in the class they belong to. From Bellamy (200397) view, a classless society also means an purlieu of rectitude in distribution of resources. This can be impossible because equity is simply dividing all resources and power equally to all. much(prenominal) an environment also entails that there is no need for political leaders or governance because everyone has the same level of political and economic power.According to Bellamy (200398), Karl Marxs idea of man in the state of nature is that he is selfish and will take benefit of others for their own selfish gain. This also means power cannot equally be divided. Democracies therefore choose representatives who are empowered by the people to make state decisions because they understand that not everyone can lead at the same time. Therefore political equity is an impossible situation. According to Theodore (200468) equality is fairness in the distribution of resources means of production and power. It means people are treated fairly depending on their position to the means of production.From the deductions made above, Classes will still exist in a state of equ ality but fairness is the leading factor. The working class should not be exploited by the capitalist but their surplus value should be equivalent and proportional to their labour input. equity can also mean the working class can determine their own class because the means of production are not to the advantage of one class only but to everyone. The individual in an environment of equality will have the power to determine their own position in the political and economic stratus.