COMMUNICATION2005Living and coping with change is a fact of life for organizations and the individuals at bottom them . Many factors such(prenominal) as globalization technological advances , deregulation , privatization , mergers or acquisitions coupled with a movement of labor-intensive projects to little pricy locations and changing customer demands ar forcing organizations to changelessly check into their purpose and raison d etre . This evaluative process will answer them to decide which changes : strategical or operational , will wee to be do in to survive and grow match to Micklethwait in this wise dynamic environment the only constant is change (Micklethwait , 95 . Yet research indicates that up to 70 per cent of change programs fail and poor internal converse is seen as the precept reason for such failure by Mu rdoch . This is partly because . employees be among those groups that are crucial to an organization . Depending on their perception of (organisational mathematical process ) they will communicate positive or negative messages to an another(prenominal)(prenominal) important publics who could impact on organisational performance such as community members , politicians , and financial supporters (Murdoch , 8 . Argenti adds to this by stating that if a gild has lost the faith and seemliness of its employees , it faces an uphill battle as it tries to correct its errors and rebuild credibleness with the very unrivaleds who cast off the approaching of most corporations in their range of a function (Argenti 115While numerous organizations do realize the importance of having good employee conversations , they static find it hard to forge the link mingled with what gets said and what gets do (Horn , 1 . Many of the paradoxes which organizations cope with attend to to explai n why this may occur . These paradoxes inclu! de issues such as the crevice between rhetoric and reality on the quality of employees in organizational success as espoused by Garratt . He contends that one of the great lies in business is the chairperson s statement in the annual report that our people are our greatest plus (Garratt , 5 .

If this is true , he argues why they are not valued financially so that they egress on the chemical equilibrium sheet , not just as a be in the profit and passing reputation . While in times of trouble , particularly in low delicate industries , corporations are prepared to open and leave out plants fit to cold calcu lations of labor costs and efficiencies with little envision for the other less tangible benefits such as fealty associated with employee property (Kearns , 17Several researchers have identified two dimensions contributing to organizational chat : an cultureal dimension that focuses on merriment with the content and light of information and a relational dimension that focuses on satisfaction with communication relationships with other organizational members . Quirke emphasized these two aspects in a discussion of communication for strategic advantage by stating that the role of communication becomes not the top-down dissemination of solicitude view , but the bottom-up means of connecting those who know the specifics of what needs to be improved to those who have authority to make changes get hold (Quirke , 33 . Simultaneously , Pincus grouped the communication satisfaction dimensions...If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you ! want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment